The Flexibility Myth: How Gig Work Undermines Security and Shifts Public Costs

This paper argues that the structure of the gig economy, despite its branding as flexible and empowering, is designed to offload risk and responsibility from companies onto workers and public systems. Platforms rely on legal ambiguity, strategic misclassification, and algorithmic control to avoid providing basic protections such as health insurance, paid leave, retirement contributions, and unemployment support. The result is a labor model that reduces costs for corporations while exposing workers to chronic income volatility, delayed healthcare, and long-term insecurity. These harms fall disproportionately on marginalized communities, including racial minorities, immigrants, and low-income individuals, many of whom turn to gig work due to exclusion from traditional employment. The paper traces these impacts across three core domains: economic instability, physical and psychological health risks, and systemic public costs. It draws on recent data, legal cases, and policy analysis to show how platform design choices deepen inequality and undermine the social safety net. Reform is not only possible but necessary. The paper concludes by proposing structural interventions, including clearer worker classification standards, the creation of portable benefits, and the decoupling of healthcare from employment status, that would preserve job flexibility while restoring fairness and dignity to contingent labor. Without these changes, the gig model threatens to normalize insecurity as a default condition of modern work.